Been thinking a lot about AI disclosure for games, since it's been a hot topic.

Steam requires disclosure for player-facing content created with the help of AI tools, but says efficiency gains from AI development tools aren't the focus.

Let's say I'm making a tree mesh for my game.

Two obvious endpoints:

• I manually model it in Blender. No disclosure.
• I generate it using Tripo/Meshy. Disclosure.

Now let's interpolate from t=0 to t=1:

1. I model the tree, but use a Codex-written exporter.
2. I model the tree, but use Codex-written UV, LOD and geometry optimization tools.
3. I model the tree, but write some scripts, with Codex help, to automate branch placement, leaf distribution, etc.
4. I automate more of the modelling until I've written a procedural tree generator.
5. I design and write my own procedural tree generator, with Codex helping debug and optimize it.
6. I design the procedural tree generator, but Codex writes the implementation.
7. I give Codex reference images, ask it to suggest improvements to my design, then implement those suggestions myself.
8. Same as above, but Codex implements the suggested improvements.
9. I give Codex reference images and ask it to design and implement the generator itself.
10. I use that generator, manually selecting and tweaking parameters until I'm happy with the trees.
11. Codex operates the generator and chooses the parameters, but I review and approve the results.
12. Codex operates the generator, chooses the parameters, and selects which trees ship, without my involvement.
13. I ask Codex to operate Blender directly and create the trees.
14. I generate the trees using Tripo/Meshy.

Under a literal reading, at every point in that list, the player-facing content was "created with the help of AI tools".

At what point did this cross from AI-assisted development into AI-generated art?

Is this going to be the same for everyone?