跳到正文
Kensei· 来源· @0xKense1 · X·· 2 天前精选AI 评分75
推荐理由

通过对比Tripo与Fable 5.2的建模效果,直观展示了不同工具在成本、质量及部件可动性上的差异。

正文 · 原文

i made the same game car BOTH ways: tripo for 60 cents vs fable 5.2 in blender with 174 real parts FOR FREE

tripo: one mesh in 320 loose pieces. opus cleaned it up, cut off the wheels and gave it a face, 20 parts at the end

fable 5.2 in blender: 1,674 lines of python, about 22 minutes of fable time. chassis, engine, cabin, body panels and the face are 174 separate parts, and the whole car builds in half a second

if you only need the better quality look, tripo is your choice but not free. if you want parts that move, break off or swap, build it in code free but not so good quality then fable 5.2

full workflow in the article below

来源:Kensei · x.com